而,被告获得的利润只有被告最清楚,原告是不可能从被告处取得该证据的。被告很有可能因害怕自己赔偿数额大而故意毁灭证据,导致原告无法获得应有的赔偿数额而权利受损,因此这里就不适用“谁主张、谁举证”的原则,也无法适用“举证责任倒置”的原则,这时,应免除原告的举证责任,在被告不愿举证的情况下,由法院根据原告提供的其制售相同产品的利润额乘上被告的销售数量来认定被告获利,即举证责任的推定。
由以上案例的分析,我们可以看到商业秘密侵权案件的复杂性,如果只是简单运用“谁主张、谁举证”或唯一一种方法,很难将一个该类案件公正、高效地判决,使当事人的权益受到应有的保护。因此,举证责任在商业秘密侵权案件中的分配是一个重要的值得探讨的问题。
参考文献:
[1]孔祥俊.《商业秘密保护法原理》[m].北京:中国法制出版社出版,1999—145
[2]张玉瑞.《商业秘密保护法学》[m].北京:中国法制出版社出版,1999—102
[3]毕玉谦.《民事证据法判例实务研究》[m].北京:法律出版社出版版,2001—86
[4]叶自强.《民事证据研究》[m].北京:法律出版社出版版,2002—134
[5]陈刚.《证明责任法研究》[m].中国人民大学出版社,2000—149
onus probandi’s distribution in the case of infringement of right in business secret
abstract: it is difficult to adjudge the case about infringement of right in business secret , and the key is how to use the ways of onus probandi’s distribution in order to protect the legal rights and interests of both parties . due to the heaviness of accuser’s onus probandi comparing with other cases about infringement of patent right and the complexity of the case , it is not enough to select only one to use from the ways of onus probandi’s distribution. if we want to ensure that the case’s adjudgement in usiness secret is fair and square , it is have nothing for it but using all ways of onus probandi’s distribution and easing the accuser’s burden rightly , flexibly and adequately .
key: onus probandi ; proof ord ; business secret
字数统计:5572
e-mail: [email protected]
telephone: 0373-2216412/3769608
上一页 [1] [2] [3]