死刑替代利弊分析 |
|
|
死刑适用的一个“焊接”过程——是将死刑适用标准不统一这个“缝”,用回收死刑复核权和最高人民法院法官严谨的审核工作予以焊接,使死刑适用的标准达到统一和无懈可击的程度。从而,在死刑方面立法没有作出任何修订的情况下,大幅度减少死刑判决和执行的数字。除此之外,是否还可以通过其他的刑罚方式(替代措施)限制、减少死刑的适用,这是我们立论的切入角度。死刑替代措施的适用同样是一种弥补缺漏的方式,同样能够通过法官的司法裁量过程修补立法关于死刑规定的过多、过广的现象。因此,大量适用无期徒刑能否替代死刑的适用,进而调整我国死刑适用的现状;能否通过全面实施死刑替代措施,最终实现全面废除死刑的目标,是本文论述的期望之点。 【参考文献】 {1}http://www. penalreform. org/ resources/new -2007-newsletter-57-en. pdf. {2}A. L. Atubbs: Clemency: The Future of the Death Penalty[C]. Published and Manufactured in the United States of America, 1999. {3}http://www. deathpenaltyinfo. org/newsanddev. php?scid = 59. {4}http://www. deathpenaltyinfo. org/FactSheet. pdf. {5}虞平. 量刑与刑的量化——兼论“电脑量刑”[J].法学家, 2007, (2). {6}王奎. 南非的死刑废除:历史、根据与特征[J]. 西亚非洲, 2006, (9). {7}Yoshihiro Yasuda. The Death Penalty in Japan [A].at Council of Europe edited: Death Penalty Beyond Abolition[C]. council of Europe Publishing, 2004. {8}Eric Cullen and Tim Newell: Murderers and L ife Imp risonment: Containment, Treatment, Safety and Risk[M]. Waterside Press, 1999. {9}Peter Hodgkinson: Alternatives to the Death Penalty The United Kingdom Experience [A]. at Council of Europe edited: Death Penalty Beyond Abolition [C].council of Europe Publishing, 2004. {10}Roger Hood: The Death Penalty: A World2wide Perspective [M]. Oxford, Clarendon Press, third edition, 2002. {11}William J. Bowers and Benjamin D. Steiner: The People Want an Alternative to the Death Penalty [A]. at Glen H. Stassen ed. : Death Penalty [C].The Pilgrim Press, 1998.
上一页 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] |
|
|
|
上一个论文: 试论无独立请求权第三人制度 下一个论文: 诉讼证据存在形式的信息解读 |
|