n of large, publicly held companies, 139 u. pa. l. rev. 125, 149-150 (1990).
[99] baird, supra note 27, p. 281.
[100] in re ames dept. stores, inc., 115 b.r. 34 (bankr. s.d.n.z. 1990)。也有一些法院对交叉担保持怀疑态度。in re saybrook mfg. co., 963 f.2d 1490 (1992, ca11 ga).
[101] dahiya, debtor-in-possession financing and bankruptcy resolution: empirical evidence, 69 j. fin. econ. 259, 265 (2003).
[102] bris et al., the costs of bankruptcy: chapter 7 liquidation versus chapter 11 reorganization, 61 the journal of finance 1253, 1290 (2006).
[103] frank, an empiricial investigation of u.s. firms in reorganization, 44 journal of finance. 747 (1989).
[104] ayotte et al., review: an efficiency-based explanation for current corporate reorganization practice (lynn m. lopucki, courting failure, university of michigan press, 2005), 73 u. chi. l. rev. 425 (2006).
[105] müko-eidenmüller, § 222 inso rn. 44; uhlenbruck-lüer, § 222 inso rn. 20; bgh mdr 2006, 116 (118) (bgh vom 7.7.2005 – ix zb 266/04).
[106] müko-eidenmüller, § 222 inso rn. 29; hk-flessner, § 222 inso rn. 11; hess/weis, die sachgerechte abgrenzung der gläubigergruppen nach der inso, invo 1998, 64 (67).
[107] marotzke, die dinglichen sicherheiten im neuen insolvenzrecht, zzp 1996, 429 (437).
[108] 前引注39, bork, rn.336.
[109] schiessler, der insolvenzplan, bielefeld, 1997, s. 149.
[110] 在德国破产实践中，法院通常不会对被给以利息补偿的担保债权人的投票权提出质疑。lg göttingen nzi 2005, 41 (42 f.); olg köln (beschluss vom 5. 1. 2001 – 2 w 228 / 00) nzi 2001, 660 ff.
[111] 前引注7，安建书，第150页。
[112] 见《最高人民法院关于审理企业破产案件确定管理人报酬的规定》，第13条

上一页  [1] [2] [3] [4]