ard p. welch and andrew j. turezyn,folk on the delawaregeneral corporation law: fundamentals, boston: little, brown and company, 1993, pp. 510-515.
[4]参见melvin aron eisenberg,corporations and other business organizations, 8thedition, new york:foundation press, 2000, pp. 180-181.
[5]参见stephen m. bainbridge,corporation law and economics, new york: foundation press, 2002, pp.450-452.
[6]rufus j. baldwin and another v. thomas h. canfield, 26 minn. 43,1 n.w. 261; 1879 minn.
[7]may v. bigmar, inc., 838 a.2d. 285, 288 n.8 (del. ch. 2003).
[8]stephen m. bainbridge,the new corporate governance in theory and practice, new york: oxford u-niversity press, 2008, p. 82.
[9]参见mads andenas and frank wooldridge,european comparative company law, cambridge: cam-bridge university press, 2009,pp. 288,291,308.德国明确允许公司章程作出例外规定,但个体决策不能对抗多数决策。
[10]参见lawrence e. mitchell, fairness and trust in corporate law,"duke law journal, vol. 43, no. 3(dec. 1993), pp. 425-491.这里所说的合同法和行政法,只是一般规范意义上的,在理论上也存在着争议,包括合同法中的对价理论和行政法中的公平要求。参见larry a. dimatteo,contract theory: theevolution of contractual intent, east lansing: michigan state university press, 1998;也可参见h. w.r. wade and c. f. forsyth,administrative law, 7thedition, oxford: oxford university press, 1994,p.44.
[11]参见oliver williamson, corporate governance,"yale law journal, vol. 93, no. 7 (jun. 1984), pp.1197-1230.
[12]参见melvin a. eisenberg, the legal role of shareholders and management in modern corporate deci-sion-making,"california law review, vol. 57, no. 1 (jan. 1969), pp. 10-14.
[13]参见melvin aron eisenberg, legal models of management structure in the modern corporation: of-ficers, directors, and accountants,"californialaw review, vol. 63, no. 2 (mar. 1975), pp. 375-439.
[14]参见james d. cox and thomas lee hazen,cox & hazen on corporations: including unincorporatedforms of doing business, 2ndedition, vol. 1, new york: aspen publishers, 2003, p. 409.
[15]参见benjamin a. streeter, iii, co-determination in west germany-through the best (and worst) oftimes,"chicago-kent law review, vol. 58, no. 3, 1982, pp. 982-983.
[16]参见lynne l. dallas, the relational board: three theories of corporate boards of directors,"journalof corporation law, vol. 22, no. 1 (fall 1996), pp. 1-25.
[17]参见lynne l. dallas, the multiple roles of corporate boards of directors,"san diego law review,vol. 40, no. 3 (fall 2003), pp. 781-820.
[18]参见oliver hart, an economist s view of fiduciary duty,"u

上一页  [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 下一页