theory of contract”,in virginia law review, 78（1992）， pp. 1175，1195.
[41]randy e. barnett,“conflicting visions: a critique of ian macneil’s relational theory of contract”, in virginia law review, 78 （1992）,pp. 1175，1181.
[42]randy e.barnett,“conflicting visions: a critique of ian macneil’s relational theory of contract”,in virginia law review, 78（1992）,pp.1175，1195.
[43]randy e.barnett. “conflicting visions:a critique of ian macneil’s relational theory of contract”, in virginia law review,78（1992）, pp. 1175，1195.
[44]randy e.barnett,“conflicting visions: a critique of ian macneil’s relational theory of contract”, in virginia law review, 78（1992）. pp. 1175，1195.
[45]randy e.barnett,“conflicting visions: a critique of ian macneil’s relational theory of contract”, in virginia law review, 78（1992）, pp. 1175,1195.
[46]randy e. barnett,“conflicting visions: a critique of ian macnetl’s relational theory of contract”,in virginia law review,78（1992）,pp.1175，1182.
[47]在笔者看来，关系契约理论无疑是世界契约理论的一场革命，现在已经与古典和新古典契约理论并称为契约理论的三大流派和阶段。
[48][日]内田贵：《契约的再生》，胡海宝译，载梁慧星主编：《为权利而斗争》，北京：中国法制出版社2002年版，第251页。
[49]melvin a.eisenberg,“why there is no law of relational contracts”，in northwestern university law review, 94 （2000）, p. 813.
[50]ian r. macneil,“relational contract theory: challenges and queries”，innorthwestern university law review , 94 （2000） , pp. 877,897.
[51]melvin a. eisenberg,“why there is no law of relational contracts”，in northwestern university law review,94 （2000）, p. 816.
[52]melvin a. eisenberg,“why there is no law of relational contracts”，in northwestern university law review, 94 （2000）,p. 818.
[53]melvin a. eisenberg,“why there is no law of relational contracts”，in northwestern university law review,94 （2000） ,p. 821.
[54]jay m. feinman,“relational contract theory in context”，in northwestern university law review , 94（2000） , pp. 737,748.
[55]ian r. macneil,“relational contract theory: challenges and queries”，in northwestern university law review. 94 （2000）, pp. 877,899.
[56]randy e. barnett,“conflicting visions: a critique of ian macneil’ s relational theory of contract”,invirginia law review,78 （1992）,pp.1175，1179.
[57]ian r. macneil,“the many futures of contracts”,in s. cal. l. rev,47（1974），pp. 691,810.
[58]melvin a. eisenberg,“why there is no law of relational contracts”，in northwestern university law review, 94 （2000）, p. 805.
[59]john e. murray. jr.，“contract theories and the rise of neoform

上一页  [1] [2] [3] [4] 下一页