effects of regulation fd: evidence from rating agencies[j].journal of financial economics,2005(76):309-330.

[13]khorana, a., servaes, h., tufano, p.explaining the size of the mutual fund industry around the world. journal of financial economics,2005(78):145-185.
[14]ka borokhovich, k brunarski, ys harman, r parrino(2006), variation in the monitoring incentives of outside stockholders[j].journal of law and economics,49, in press.
[15]levitz, jennifer(2006), do mutual fund managers back ceo pay?—study finds firms failed to use voting power in favor of linking compensation to performance, the wall street journal, 28 march, p. c.1.
[16]lily qiu, hong wan. selection or influence? institutional investors and acquisition targets, working paper,2008.
[17]lily qiu. selection or influence? institutional investors and corporate acquisitions.working paper,2008.
[18]mike burkart, fausto panunzi. agency conflicts, ownership concentration, and legal shareholder protection,journal of financial intermediation,2006(15):1-31.
[19]pascual berrone, jordi surroca and josep a. tribó. the influence of blockholders on r&d investments intensity:evidence from spain. working paper,2005.
[20]qiu, lily. which institutional investors monitor? evidence from acquisition activity, brown university working paper,2004.
[21]son anh le, bruce walters, mark kroll. the moderating effects of external monitors on the relationship between r&d spending and firm performance,journal of business research,2006(59):278-287.
[22]samuel,c. stock market and investment: the govemance role of the market,the world bank working paper,1996.
[23]van nuys,k.corporate governance through the proxy process:evidence from the 1989 honeywell proxy sociatation[j].journal of financial economics,1993(34):1010-132.
[24]wahal,s.,j.j.mcconnell. do institutional investors exacerbate managerial myopia? emory university and purdue university working paper,2000.

上一页  [1] [2] [3]