(n.y. 1926).
(41)see herbert l. packer, the limits of the criminal sanction part ii, stanford university press, 1968, p.162.
(42)ibid., p.206.
(43)ibid., pp.211-214.
(44)ibid., p.222.
(45)ibid., p.223.
(46)united states v. garsson, 291 f. 646, 649 (s.d.n.y. 1923).
(47)herbert l. packer, the limits of the criminal sanction part ii, stanford university press, 1968, p.230.
(48)ibid., p.170.
(49)ibid., p.151.
(50)ibid., p.173.
(51)ibid., p.168.
(52)herbert l. packer, the limits of the criminal sanction part ii, stanford university press, 1968, p.180.
(53)ibid., p.203.
(54)ibid., p.191.
(55)ibid., p.180.
(56)ibid.
(57)ibid., p.168.
(58)ibid., p.207.
(59)ibid., p.217.
(60)ibid., p.224.
(61)herbert l. packer, the limits of the criminal sanction part ii, stanford university press, 1968, p.224.
(62)ibid., p.167.
(63)ibid., pp.231-232.
(64)ibid., p.173.
(65)ibid., p.239.
(66)see generally, liva baker, miranda: crime, law and politics, atheneum,1983, pp.111-217; craig bradley, the failure of the criminal procedure revolution, university of pennsylvania press, 1993; fred graham, the due process revolution: the warren court's impact on criminal law, hayden book co, 1970.
(67)see mapp v. ohio, 367 u.s. 643 (1961).
(68)elkins v. united states, 364 u.s. 206 (1960).
(69)see, e.g., rogers v. richmond, 365 u.s. 534 (1961).
(70)see chimel v. california, 395 u.s. 752 (1969).
(71)see spinelli v. united states, 393 u.s. 410 (1969).
(72)katz v. united states, 389 u.s. 347 (1967).
(73)terry v. ohio, 392 u.s. 1 (1968).
(74)372 u.s. 335 (1963). see herbert l. packer, the limits of the criminal sanction part ii, stanford university press, 1968, pp.236-237.
(75)miranda v. arizona, 384 u.s. 436,479 (1966).
(76)liva baker, miranda: crime, law and politics, atheneum, 1983, pp 207-208; see craig bradley, the failure of the criminal procedure revolution, university of pennsylvania press, 1993.
(77)klopfer v. north carolina, 386 u.s. 213,216 (1967).
(78)brady v. maryland, 373 u.s. 83, 86 (1963).
(79)griffin v. illinois, 380 u.s. 609,613 (1965).
(80)in re gault, 387 u.s. 1, 2-3(1967).
(81)in re winship, 397 u.s. 358,367(1970).
上一页 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] ... 下一页 >>